Bacterial signatures for diagnosis of colorectal cancer by machine learning

Authors

  • Yuan Kexin Qian Weichang College, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • Chen Xuexinyi School of Chinese Medicine·School of Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University, of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Zhu Xinru Medical School·Integrated Medical School, Nanjing University of Chinese, Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Li Yun College of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Wang Junlu College of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Li Tianzi College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61603/ceas.v1i1.6

Keywords:

colorectal cancer, bacterial signatures, machine learning, clinical diagnosis

Abstract

Invasive methods such as colonoscopy are more commonly used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and diagnosis, but these methods are not easily accepted and have limitations. In this paper, we aim to exploit the close relationship between intestinal flora and the development of CRC. A T-test was used to screen and compare the intestinal flora of healthy individuals and patients, and strains with significant differences were selected as characteristic ones. In addition, three AI learning models, Random forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Back propagation neural network (BPNN), were used to build a colorectal cancer diagnosis model based on intestinal flora. Overall, the investigation carried out by us has revealed six highly divergent species between healthy individuals and patients from t-tests and key species associated with CRC. The results were validated against each other, confirming the reliability of the obtained key strains, and providing a new idea for the clinical diagnosis of CRC.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bacterial signatures for diagnosis of colorectal cancer by machine learning. (2023). Cambridge Explorations in Arts and Sciences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.61603/ceas.v1i1.6